February 2004
[ Return to Archives Page ] [ Return to February 2004 Issue ]

Safety Codes and Standards Receives a Boost in Funds
by Steve Hester
National Hydrogen Association


The budget proposed by the President for FY 2005 for Hydrogen Codes and Standards and Safety activities shows a significant increase.

For hydrogen, the proposed funding is about $150 million, and for fuel cells, the proposed funding is $77 million. Specifically, the safety and codes and standards activities have a proposed funding of $18 million, a number that is approximately three times the FY04 appropriations.

In FY05, there is also the requirement to formulate and fund hydrogen-related efforts as part of an inter-agency project involving DOE, EPA, NIST and DOT. The details will be published when the project is signed-off by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

Separately, DOT has requested funding to perform crash test studies on a sample of the fuel cell-powered cars being operated as part of the California Fuel Cell Partnership.

Of course the budget could still face the problem in FY05 of Congressionally-mandated projects (as had to be dealt with in this year’s FY04 budget). Though there can and may be mandated reappropriations for portions of the hydrogen budget, the hydrogen community can expect that the $18 million budget for hydrogen related codes and standards efforts will be maintained. This optimism is related to a report by the National Academies’ National Research Council (NRC), released on February 4 that identified the importance of codes and standards for hydrogen and fuel cells. The full NRC report is available at http://books.nap.edu/books/0309091632/html/index.html but is quoted below for the areas that specifically mention codes and standards:

Infrastructure
A nationwide, high-quality, safe, and efficient hydrogen infrastructure will be required in order for hydrogen to be used widely in the consumer sector. While it will be many years before hydrogen use is significant enough to justify an integrated national infrastructure—as much as two decades in the scenario posited by the committee— regional infrastructures could evolve sooner. The relationship between hydrogen production, delivery, and dispensing is very complex, even for regional infrastructures, as it depends on many variables associated with logistics systems and on many public and private entities. Codes and standards for infrastructure development could be a significant deterrent to hydrogen advancement if not established well ahead of the hydrogen market.

Similarly, since resilience to terrorist attack has become a major performance criterion for any infrastructure system, the design of future hydrogen infrastructure systems may need to consider protection against such risks.

Recommendation ES-3b
The DOE should accelerate work on codes and standards and on permitting, addressing head-on the difficulties of working across existing and emerging hydrogen standards in cities, counties, states, and the nation.

For detailed information about the President’s proposed budget for DOE for FY05, go to the following web site: http://www.mbe.doe.gov/budget/05budget/index.htm