January 2002
[ Return to Archives Page ] [ Return to January 2002 Issue ]

Developing International Hydrogen Standards Gets More Complicated
by Robert L. Mauro
Chairman of the U.S. Technical Advisory Group


Several years ago, European corporations and the European Commission embarked on a process of creating regulations for hydrogen vehicles and supporting infrastructure. Upon completion and adoption of these regulations, they will replace national vehicle standards for Europe. Phase 1 of the European Integrated Hydrogen Project (EIHP) is completed, and two draft regulations on liquid and gaseous hydrogen storage tanks have been submitted for adoption to the European Economic Commission (CEN) by the German Ministry of Transportation. Phase 2 of the EIHP, scheduled for completion in January 2004, will include new regulations for vehicle components and systems, refueling procedures and periodic inspections. This information is available at EIHP’s web site: www.eihp.org.

The development of regulations for European vehicle standards is appropriate. The problem arises because CEN is an organ of the United Nations (UN). CEN has the ability to request that the UN harmonize standards globally. In fact, EIHP states that its intent is to develop the base documents for global standards. The UN can either move forward on harmonization or recommend that the standards be handled by the appropriate existing international standards organizations, such as International Organization of Standardization (ISO). The latter course is most likely if only to avoid undermining ISO.

For the United States, this presents a unique set of issues. The U. S. is not participating in the process of regulation development under the EIHP. It, like Canada and much of the world, will be presented with a finished product for comment. This puts the largest vehicle market in the world in the position of non-participation until late in the standards process. Three U.S. concerns that must be addressed are: advanced technologies are not adequately considered in the standards process, U.S. approaches to testing and certifications will not be incorporated in the draft standards, and the U.S. stakeholder interests will not be considered in drafting the proposed standards.

The implications of the EIHP are already being seen. The Europeans are pushing for rapid development of a standard for on-board liquid hydrogen storage based on the material developed under EHIP, yet different from the on-board liquid hydrogen storage standard the ISO has been developing over the last several years. During the last ISO TC 197 WG 6 meeting on on-board hydrogen storage tanks for vehicles, the Europeans asked for changes in the standards to make them consistent with the proposed tank standard submitted to CEN. A standing committee of the UN that deals with vehicle emissions (GRPE) is forming an ad hoc Hydrogen Work Group to recommend whether to adopt the EIHP regulations, and how to handle those regulations.